Sunday, June 17, 2007

happy father's day; found some old friends


last night a friend from long ago and far away found me on facebook. a phone call later and we chatted for a couple of hours.

tonight, the kids had me over at karen's house for supper and aftewards while karen and darlene were out for a canoe ride, and while watching monty python and the holy grail with them, i came across a book i had bought from renee in the 80s: we are all part of one another: a barbara deming reader. so, i went looking online for more about deming (1917-1984).

this is from Barbara Deming: An Activist Life, by Donna McCabe:

"For Barbara, the task for all of us is to erase the so-called differences between the sexes, bring out the women in all men, the man in all women. By doing so, we are able to act not as atomized individuals, but as parts of a larger community. We join gender back into an singular noun. Barbara saw this leap as possible when discussing gender in a way she was not able to understand during her lifetime of activism. "I would say myself that our sexuality is given us so that we can commune with one another. It cracks our single selves. Without sexuality we would be impossibly isolated within our individualities. We could not experience community, could not experience in our flesh the truth that we are, all of us, members one of another" (244). Our sexuality is very damaged. Damaged by the attempt to split it into the so-called male and so-called female. This lie is what has weakened any possibilities of communion. "If society did not try to make us all heterosexuals - and if patriarchy were dispelled and, with it, the power inequities that make most heterosexual relationships so distorting - my guess is that we would find ourselves quite naturally attracted to either sex" (246). Barbara recognized the base opposition that created all others to be gender. A separation of our very be-ing."

how timely is that now that i'm going back to school to study language and social justice? it's as if it's all coming back to me, and i hope to give it all back.

Tuesday, June 12, 2007

excerpt from temporary insanity: a world in transition, by philip slater

i was following up on one of the sociologists referenced in my textbook, Philip Slater. i never heard of him, but it seems i should have --not only is he a sociologist, he's an actor and a playwright. in 1982 he was chosen by MS. Magazine as one of its "male heroes."

here's the conclusion to a essay on his homepage:

the whole essay is worth reading, (he has a lot to say about religious fundamentalists, for example) but i thought i'd get to the point: the world is changing from a control culture to an integrative culture, and slater is optimistic....

he writes:


If change happened slowly and smoothly we might be able to handle it more gracefully. But that's not what happens. As they sense an old cultural system dying around them, those who espouse it will assert its values more harshly, more stridently, more desperately. The most extreme forms of authoritarianism, for example, occurred in the 1930s, when democracy was a growing trend.
The growth of Integrative Culture and the simultaneous rise of fundamentalism around the world make us feel the world's going in opposite directions at the same time. We've never been more concerned about the environment yet never more destructive of it; never more distrustful of technology yet never more dependent on it; never more opposed to violence yet never more fascinated with it; never more ego-driven and never more hungry to lose ourselves in something beyond ego; never more health conscious yet never more unhealthy. And while we've never had more ways of connecting with each other, we've never felt more disconnected.

These are the predictable symptoms of a culture in transition. Old familiar habits have begun to seem irrelevant or destructive, while the emerging system still feels awkward and uncomfortable, like shoes that haven't yet shaped themselves to our feet.

[his conclusion;]


It will be decades before Integrative Culture achieves the kind of general acceptance that Control Culture enjoyed for thousands of years.
..
A new cultural system tends to be built around what was trivialized in the old one. Integrative values were never absent during the Controller era, they were simply assigned inferior status--something women concerned themselves with. Similarly, when Integrative Culture achieves a comfortable preponderance in our shrinking world, Controller values will have a niche—something men play with. The kind of consensus that will permit this is a long way off, but we can take some comfort from the likelihood that our descendants will enjoy it. Prophets of doom always attract an audience because people love drama, but the probable reality is more mundane: we can expect a long period of adaptation, during which violent flare-ups, like those of this decade, will gradually diminish in frequency as more and more of the world embraces the emerging culture. Life on our planet will then settle into an equilibrium--one that may not create any more happiness, but will at least be more stable.

Monday, June 11, 2007

Declaration of Interdependence

Declaration of Interdependence

Five members of the David Suzuki Foundation team wrote the following Declaration of Interdependence in 1992 for the United Nations' Earth Summit in Rio de Janeiro.

In 2001, Finnish composer Pehr Henrik Nordgren wrote his Symphony no. 6 "Interdependence" based on the declaration, which also served as lyrics to the piece. It was performed for the first time in Sendai, Japan in December, 2001.

version française
Download the declaration as an Adobe PDF document.

This We Know

    We are the earth, through the plants and animals that nourish us.

    We are the rains and the oceans that flow through our veins.

    We are the breath of the forests of the land, and the plants of the sea.

    We are human animals, related to all other life as descendants of the firstborn cell.

    We share with these kin a common history, written in our genes.

    We share a common present, filled with uncertainty.

    And we share a common future, as yet untold.

    We humans are but one of thirty million species weaving the thin layer of life enveloping the world.

    The stability of communities of living things depends upon this diversity.

    Linked in that web, we are interconnected -- using, cleansing, sharing and replenishing the fundamental elements of life.

    Our home, planet Earth, is finite; all life shares its resources and the energy from the sun, and therefore has limits to growth.

    For the first time, we have touched those limits.

    When we compromise the air, the water, the soil and the variety of life, we steal from the endless future to serve the fleeting present.

This We Believe

    Humans have become so numerous and our tools so powerful that we have driven fellow creatures to extinction, dammed the great rivers, torn down ancient forests, poisoned the earth, rain and wind, and ripped holes in the sky.

    Our science has brought pain as well as joy; our comfort is paid for by the suffering of millions.

    We are learning from our mistakes, we are mourning our vanished kin, and we now build a new politics of hope.

    We respect and uphold the absolute need for clean air, water and soil.

    We see that economic activities that benefit the few while shrinking the inheritance of many are wrong.

    And since environmental degradation erodes biological capital forever, full ecological and social cost must enter all equations of development.

    We are one brief generation in the long march of time; the future is not ours to erase.

    So where knowledge is limited, we will remember all those who will walk after us, and err on the side of caution.

This We Resolve

    All this that we know and believe must now become the foundation of the way we live.

    At this turning point in our relationship with Earth, we work for an evolution: from dominance to partnership; from fragmentation to connection; from insecurity, to interdependence.

stop heavy metal pollution

i don't mean led zep or metallica, i mean cadmium, mercury, etc.

here's a quote from david suzuki.

The simplest way to stop heavy metals: don't buy things you don't need, especially electronics. The sad fact is that all those great electronic devices usually go obsolete very quickly. (The average useful life for a computer is only five years, and about 18 months for cell phones.) If you must buy something, buy it second-hand. Here are some places to get used goods:

Freecycle: http://www.freecycle.org
Craigslist: http://toronto.craigslist.org/about/cities.html
Salvation Army: http://www.salvationarmy.ca/


and i didn't know that
coal-burning power plants are the single largest source of mercury in Canada. Reducing your energy use helps keep mercury out of the environment.

on this page there are links to more info: http://www.davidsuzuki.org/NatureChallenge/newsletters/Metal_June2007/page5.asp